Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add NodeExecutionURL #822

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Add NodeExecutionURL #822

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

pingsutw
Copy link
Member

@pingsutw pingsutw commented Oct 18, 2023

TL;DR

Click Flyte button: copy flyte URL
Shift + Flyte button: copy the code snippet
Click the code snippet: copy the code snippet

Type

  • Bug Fix
  • Feature
  • Plugin

Are all requirements met?

  • Code completed
  • Smoke tested
  • Unit tests added
  • Code documentation added
  • Any pending items have an associated Issue

Complete description

image

Tracking Issue

NA

Follow-up issue

NA

pingsutw added 2 commits May 3, 2023 21:54
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <[email protected]>
@pingsutw pingsutw marked this pull request as draft October 18, 2023 18:20
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <[email protected]>
return (
<WaitForData {...executionData}>
<PanelSection>
<LiteralMapViewer
map={executionData.value.fullInputs}
mapTaskIndex={taskIndex}
/>
{executionData.value.fullInputs?.literals && (
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How do I render ExecutionNodeURL only if executionData.value.fullInputs?.literals not None?

{executionData.value.fullInputs?.literals && doesn't work

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ursucarina , can you help?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 19 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (3edbb2b) 63.34% compared to head (2bc8570) 63.27%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #822      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.34%   63.27%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         527      528       +1     
  Lines       13400    13427      +27     
  Branches     2554     2560       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         8488     8496       +8     
- Misses       4912     4931      +19     
Files Coverage Δ
...nDetails/NodeExecutionTabs/NodeExecutionInputs.tsx 66.66% <33.33%> (-11.12%) ⬇️
...Details/NodeExecutionTabs/NodeExecutionOutputs.tsx 66.66% <33.33%> (-11.12%) ⬇️
...s/Executions/ExecutionDetails/ExecutionNodeURL.tsx 28.57% <28.57%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <[email protected]>
rr = FlyteRemote(
Config.auto(),
remote = FlyteRemote(
Config.for_endpoint(endpoint="localhost:30080"),
Copy link
Contributor

@eapolinario eapolinario Oct 18, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we get that address from the app itself? This should be the endpoint it uses to talk to admin, right?

@pingsutw pingsutw closed this Oct 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants